Skip to content
Location: India
Log inSign up
Product

The Lawfly workspace.

Connected parts that all start from the same case file. The advocate reviews everything the AI produces.

India betaAll modules below are part of the India beta. Court-record import depends on what each court publishes, so it is available where coverage exists.
Case managementIn beta

One case file for parties, court, stage and hearings.

Each case keeps its parties, court, case number, stage and next date together, with hearing notes and orders in sequence. A “what changed” view shows new orders, listings and notes since you last opened the file.

app.lawfly.in / cases / os-318-2025
Cases > O.S. No. 318 of 2025
Meena Traders v. Rao Logistics
City Civil Court, Hyderabad · Civil suit · Filed 14 Feb 2025
Stage · Evidence
Next hearing
12 Nov 2026
Court Hall 7 · 10:30
Purpose
Cross of PW1
Evidence stage
Court record
Linked
Checked today
What changed
Order dated 28 Oct uploaded
From court record · 2 pages
Hearing moved to 12 Nov
Was 5 Nov · adjourned
Note added by you
"Confirm delivery challans with client"
Hearing history
28 Oct 2026
Adjourned · PW1 absent
Order
9 Sep 2026
Issues framed
Order
21 Jul 2026
Written statement filed
Note
Illustrative interface · fictional sample data
Court recordsWhere available

Import listing and status details from the court record.

Link a case to its court record to bring listing and status details into the case file. Coverage depends on the court and the data it publishes, so availability varies. Anything you enter yourself is kept alongside the imported record.

The Lawfly team confirms coverage for your courts during onboarding.

Legal researchIn beta

Plain-language questions, answers with sources.

Ask from inside a case. Lawfly returns a summary with references to the material it drew on so you can open each source and read it yourself. AI-generated text can be wrong or incomplete, including citations; the summary is a starting point for your own reading.

Research
In context: O.S. No. 318 of 2025
AI-generated · verify before relying on it
Q. What can the court do if the defendant has not filed a written statement within the time allowed?

Where a defendant does not present a written statement within the time permitted, the court may pronounce judgment against the defendant or make such other order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit. How strictly the time limit is applied has varied between courts and between commercial and non-commercial suits. Open the sources before relying on this summary.

Sources referenced
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order VIII, Rule 1
Statute · time for written statement
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order VIII, Rule 10
Statute · procedure when party fails to present written statement
Illustrative interface · sample question, fictional case
DraftingIn beta

Drafts that start with the case details in place.

Parties, court and case number are filled from the file. You write and edit in an editor built for legal document formats and export when ready. Nothing is filed or sent by Lawfly on your behalf.

Draft · Affidavit of evidence · O.S. 318/2025
Filled from case file:CourtCase numberParties
In the Court of the City Civil Judge at Hyderabad
O.S. No. 318 of 2025
Meena Traders … Plaintiff
versus
Rao Logistics … Defendant
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION-IN-CHIEF OF PW1

I, the deponent above-named, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows:

1. I am the proprietor of the plaintiff concern and am well acquainted with the facts of the case.

2. Continue writing…

Review every line before export. Lawfly does not file or send documents on your behalf.
Illustrative interface · fictional parties
Documents and mobileIn beta

Every document on its case. The same workspace on your phone.

Orders, pleadings, evidence and correspondence are stored against the case they belong to. Open the workspace from your phone, on the web or in the Android app, when you are away from your desk. It needs an internet connection to sync cases, run research and save drafts.

9:41
Today
Wed, 12 Nov
2 hearings
Meena Traders v. Rao Logistics10:30
City Civil Court · Hall 7 · Cross of PW1
K. Devi v. Municipal Corp.2:15
High Court · Hall 12 · Arguments
Recent documents
Order · 28 Oct 2026
O.S. 318/2025 · 2 pages
Delivery challans (scan)
Added by you · yesterday
TodayCasesDocumentsResearch
Coming next

What we are working on for advocates.

None of these is in the India beta yet, and none has a release date. Each is labelled planned or under exploration.

  • Drafts that keep the source document’s formatting

    Planned

    When a draft starts from an existing document, keep its headings, numbering and layout, so less reformatting is needed before it is filed or sent.

  • Source-linked citations, with unresolved references flagged

    Planned

    Each citation opens the passage it relies on. A reference that cannot be matched to a source is shown as unresolved instead of looking confirmed.

  • Legal search across a larger collection

    Planned

    Search a larger body of judgments and legal material. Holding documents is not the same as finding the right ones reliably, so coverage and quality will be published before this is offered.

  • Drafts in your own writing style

    Under exploration

    With your permission, adapt draft wording to your style using examples you choose, applied when a draft is written. This is not the same as training a model on your documents.

  • Learning from edits you approve, with permission

    Under exploration

    Use the edits a lawyer approves to improve later suggestions, only with their permission. Edits are not used this way today.

AI assists. The advocate decides.

Sources are shown, drafts stay editable and AI-generated content is labelled inside the product. Lawfly does not provide legal advice.

Sign upSecurity & AI transparency
Ask LawflyAutomated assistant · scripted replies

Your details are used only to contact you about Lawfly. No spam.